The PRA publishes the second policy statement on Basel 3.1 and proposals on the strong and simple capital regime for smaller firms

News release

Today, the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) has published the second near-finalfootnote [1] policy statement and rules covering the implementation of Basel 3.1 standards for credit risk, the output floor, reporting and disclosure requirements in response to consultation paper CP16/22. The near-final policy statement is relevant to all PRA-regulated banks, building societies, investment firms and financial holding companies (‘firms’).

Based on latest data from firms, the PRA estimates that the Tier 1 capital requirements for major UK firms will be virtually unchanged by today’s package, with an aggregate increase of less than 1% from January 2030 when the transitional arrangements come to an end.

The near-final policy statement will give certainty to firms on their future capital requirements and deliver a better balanced and risk-sensitive approach to calculating regulatory capital under the Basel 3.1 framework. It will also support financial and economic stability, and the growth and competitiveness of the UK, while remaining aligned to international standards. We have had particular regard to growth and competitiveness considerations given that the PRA’s new secondary growth and competitiveness objective has now come into force.

The near-final policy statement takes account of feedback received through various channels which include 126 written responses received to CP16/22 as well as more than 70 meetings held with stakeholders to discuss their views. Some of the most material changes to the original proposals include:

  • Lower capital requirements for small and medium enterprise (SME) exposures: resulting in no increase in capital requirements relative to today, and improvements to reduce operational burdens, making it easier for firms to lend to SMEs;
  • Lower capital requirements for infrastructure exposures: resulting in no increase in capital requirements relative to today;
  • Lower capital requirements for trade finance-related activities: maintaining the existing UK capital requirements regulation (CRR) 20% conversion factor for ‘transaction-related contingent items’;
  • A simpler, more risk-sensitive approach to valuing residential property; and
  • An adjusted approach to calculating the output floorfootnote [2]: which improves the consistency between this, and the standardised approaches used by firms without model approval.

Implementation and next steps

To support a smooth implementation of the package and having considered feedback from the consultation as well as the implementation timelines of other jurisdictions, the PRA has decided to move the implementation date for the Basel 3.1 standards by a further six months to 1 January 2026 with a four-year transitional period ending on 31 December 2029.

Sam Woods, Deputy Governor of Prudential Regulation and CEO of the PRA said:

‘These rules will improve the way in which we regulate the banks in order to maintain safety and soundness and wider financial stability. We have made a number of important changes following consultation, and the resulting package will support growth and competitiveness while also ensuring that the UK aligns with international standards.’

The Strong and Simple capital regime

We have also published a wider banking capital package of consultation papers including CP7/24 ‘The Strong and Simple Framework: The simplified capital regime for Small Domestic Deposit Takers (SDDTs)’ which sets out proposals that would significantly simplify the capital regime for SDDTs whilst maintaining their resilience. In doing so, the proposals for the SDDT framework would also support a competitive, diverse and sustainable banking sector in the UK.

With the publication of CP7/24, the PRA has made significant progress towards tackling many of the issues with current regulation that small firms have raised in previous years.

The Strong and Simple CP proposes simplifications to all elements of the capital stack:

  • Pillar 1 risk-weighted assets would be calculated using Basel 3.1 rules, with some simplifications for SDDTs;
  • Pillar 2 would be radically simplified; and
  • There would be a single, more constant and predictable capital buffer.

In the CP, the PRA has proposed that the implementation date for the simplified capital regime for SDDTs will be 1 January 2027. The consultation period closes on 12 December 2024.

#

Source link

Earn $5,000 A MONTH From Home! Click Here



FPC’s welcoming statement for CP7/24 – The Strong and Simple Framework: the simplified capital regime for Small Domestic Deposit Takers (SDDTs)

The Financial Policy Committee (FPC) welcomes today the Prudential Regulation Authority’s (PRA’s) Consultation Paper 7/24 – The Strong and Simple Framework: the simplified capital regime for Small Domestic Deposit Takers (SDDTs).#

Source link

Earn $5,000 A MONTH From Home! Click Here



Statistical Notice 2024/11 | Bank of England

Recognised List of Software Houses for Statistical Reporting

The Bank of England is pleased to announce the availability of a BEEDS user acceptance testing environment (UAT) for software houses to test Bank of England statistical submissions. As part of this process, we will reinstate the published list of recognised software houses for Bank of England statistical reporting via the BEEDS portal.

To become a recognised software house for statistical reporting, you are required to submit a valid file for each statistical entry point (excluding form IPA) with valid data. Please note that nil returns will not be accepted.

The UAT environment will be exclusively open for software houses from 16 September to 27 September 2024. To participate, please submit your request to BEEDSsqueries@bankofengland.co.uk in preparation for the UAT window.

Access to the BEEDS UAT environment, does not grant access to the BEEDS live environment.

Upon completion of the UAT window, submissions will be validated by the Bank of England and you will be notified via e-mail once your submissions have been successfully reviewed.

Please be reminded, that the use of the Bank of England’s name in any promotional or marketing material (including press releases) requires prior approval from our Press Office.

#

Source link

Earn $5,000 A MONTH From Home! Click Here



Change in Collateral Eligibility Criteria for Regulated Covered Bonds in the Bank’s Sterling Monetary Framework – Market Notice 16 August 2024

Market notice

From 1 September, to be eligible as Level B collateral in the Bank’s Sterling Monetary Framework, the minimum original issue size of a UK, French or German Regulated Covered Bond will be lowered to £500 million or €500 million, from £1 billion or €1 billion. 

Beyond this change to the issue size criterion, the other eligibility criteria for RCBs to be Level B collateral are unchanged: the RCB must be a UK, French or German RCB and of the highest credit quality (broadly equivalent to AAA); and the underlying assets must be homogenous pools of UK or EEA social housing loans, public sector debt, or prime residential mortgage loans. 

This change reflects developments in benchmark issue sizes for regulated covered bonds and takes account of prudential liquidity requirements.

The term ‘issue size’ means the nominal amount issued, measured at the time of issue, for all RCBs of the same International Securities Identification Number (ISIN) as the RCB for which eligibility is sought.  

Covered bonds that do not meet the Level B eligibility criteria, including UK, French or German RCBs with an original issue size of less than £500million or €500million, can continue to be considered for eligibility as Level C collateral. Own-name issued RCBs can continue to be considered for eligibility as Level C collateral.

Covered bonds must also meet the Bank’s transparency requirements (see Detailed transparency requirements for asset backed securities and covered bonds – Market Notice 11 October 2019).

Following this change, RCBs that are already eligible as collateral will be reclassified between Level B and C accordingly and the Bank will contact affected participants separately.

Eligibility requests

When requesting eligibility for an RCB (or any other ABS), SMF participants must continue to complete the Bank’s ABS-CERT template and request eligibility by submitting it to the Bank’s Eligible Collateral team for review. (For more details, see the Eligible collateral page)

#

Source link

Earn $5,000 A MONTH From Home! Click Here



Chancellor appoints Professor Alan Taylor as member of the Monetary Policy Committee

News release

Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves has today confirmed that Professor Alan Taylor will join the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) on 2 September for a 3-year term, replacing current external member Professor Jonathan Haskel who has been on the MPC since September 2018.

Professor Taylor is an economist and currently Professor of International and Public Affairs at Columbia University, New York. He has served as a senior advisor to major financial institutions including Morgan Stanley and PIMCO, is a visiting scholar at the Bank of England and has published papers in the fields of macroeconomics, international economics, finance and economic history.

The Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rachel Reeves said: 

“Professor Alan Taylor’s substantial experience in both the financial sector and academia will bring valuable expertise to the Monetary Policy Committee. 

“I would also like to thank Professor Jonathan Haskel for all his work since he joined the Monetary Policy Committee.”

Andrew Bailey, Governor of the Bank of England, said:

“I’m really pleased Alan Taylor will be joining the Monetary Policy Committee this autumn, bringing with him his extensive knowledge and experience from his career in academia. This is an important time for the Committee and we will no doubt benefit from Alan’s contributions to our debates.

“I would like to also thank Jonathan Haskel for his service on the Committee over the past six years. He will be missed.”

About Professor Alan Taylor

Professor Alan Taylor is an economist and currently Professor of International and Public Affairs at Columbia University. He has served as a senior advisor at Morgan Stanley, PIMCO and McKinsey. He is a research associate of the National Bureau of Economic Research and is a research fellow of the Centre for Economic Policy Research. He is also visiting scholar at the Bank of England. He has published papers in leading academic journals in the fields of macroeconomics, international economics, finance and economic history. 

Born in Wakefield, Professor Alan Taylor graduated from King’s College, Cambridge, before receiving his PhD in Economics from Harvard University. 

About the MPC

The MPC has operational independence for monetary policy. It is comprised of the Governor of the Bank of England, three Deputy Governors, the Bank of England’s Chief Economist and four external members. External members, who are appointed by the Chancellor, may serve up to two three-year terms on the MPC.

The appointment of external members to the MPC is designed to ensure that the Committee benefits from thinking and expertise in addition to that gained inside the Bank. Each member of the MPC has expertise in the field of economics. They are independent and do not represent particular groups or areas.

About the appointment process

Professor Alan Taylor has been appointed by the Chancellor following a fair and open recruitment process run by HM Treasury. The Advisory Assessment Panel (AAP) comprised of Sam Beckett (Second Permanent Secretary and Chief Economic Advisor, HM Treasury), Daniel Gallagher (Director of Economics, HM Treasury), Silvana Tenreyro (Professor of Economics, London School of Economics) and Dame Colette Bowe (external member of the Financial Policy Committee). The AAP advised the Chancellor, informing her decision.

The Treasury is committed to appointing a diverse range of people to public appointments, including at the Bank of England. The Treasury continues to take active steps to attract the broadest range of suitable applicants for posts.

#

Source link

Earn $5,000 A MONTH From Home! Click Here



King Charles III banknote auctions raise £914,127 for charity

News release

Over the summer, Spink & Sons held four auctions (£5, £10, £20 and £50) with our Chief Cashier and Executive Director of Banking, Sarah John, opening the bidding on the first lot for the £5 auction. 

The auctions raised £914,127 for ten charities. These include the Bank’s three current ‘charities of the year’ as well as an additional seven previous charities of the year that did not benefit from the proceeds of a charity polymer banknote auction held since 2016. 

The current three charities of the year are The Childhood Trust, The Trussell Trust and Shout (powered by the charity Mental Health Innovations). The other charities to benefit from this auction and the ballot are: Carers UK, Demelza, WWF-UK, The Brain Tumour Charity, London’s Air Ambulance Charity, Child Bereavement UK, and Samaritans

The auction broke the record for the highest lot sold in a Bank of England banknote auction with a £50 sheet going for £26,000. This was followed by the £10 auction where a single note was sold for £17,000 with the serial number HB01 00002.

Sarah John, Chief Cashier and Executive Director of Banking said: I am thrilled that the auctions and public ballot of low numbered King Charles III banknotes have raised a remarkable £914,127 that will be donated to ten charities chosen by Bank of England staff. Each charity does incredible work and the monies raised will have a positive impact on people across the UK. 

Each charity received over £91,400 from the proceeds of the auction and ballot. This money could support initiatives such as the equivalent of:

  • The Childhood Trust could alleviate the impact of poverty for 2,600 disadvantaged children living in London, enhancing their physical and mental well-being, safety, and confidence to prepare them for life and ensure a better future.
  • Shout enabling their volunteers to take 9,140 potentially life-saving conversations with anyone in the UK in need of urgent support with their mental health.
  • The Trussell Trust supporting food banks in their network to provide emergency food parcels to over 7,600 people who can’t afford to eat, keep warm and pay the bills.
  • Carers UK could enable Helpline Advisors to respond to over 10,447 enquiries from unpaid carers in need of support (based on an annual average of 35,000 enquiries). 
  • Demelza could pay for two specialist nurses for a year which would provide expert clinical care for children and families wherever is best for them; in a Demelza hospice or in their homes, online, at school or in local communities.
  • WWF-UK could use this donation to protect and restore our amazing UK nature. WWF is restoring our seas by expanding seagrass meadows to help combat climate change and returning oysters to the Firth of Forth to create thriving marine habitats. On land, WWF is working with partners to restore rare chalk streams, reconnect wetlands that support native species whilst reducing flooding, and collaborating with farmers to help nature thrive.
  • The Brain Tumour Charity could fund 17 months of pioneering research on one of their Future Leaders projects to find new treatments, improve understanding, increase survival, and bring them closer to a cure. Similar funding research enabled them to announce a breakthrough in paediatric treatments in April this year and have a new medicine available on the NHS.
  • London’s Air Ambulance Charity could fund 41 missions, delivering an advanced trauma team to London’s most seriously injured patients. When there is no time to reach a hospital, their medics deliver life-saving interventions at the scene, with an average flight time of just 7.5 minutes.
  • Child Bereavement UK could fund their entire Support & Information service, including their freephone Helpline, for three months, providing lifelines for families seeking support after the death of someone important to them.
  • Samaritans: help cover the cost of training 450 new volunteers to build the skills they need to answer a call to someone in emotional distress.

The King Charles banknotes mark the first time the Bank of England has changed a monarch on our banknotes. Her late Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II, was the first monarch on our banknotes, beginning with our Series C £1 banknotes in 1960.

The King Charles banknotes are a continuation of the current series, and, as such, the serial numbers commence from the next available cypher following those previously used for the production of notes featuring Queen Elizabeth II.

#

Source link

Earn $5,000 A MONTH From Home! Click Here



Bank of England and Financial Conduct Authority – Memorandum of Understanding on the supervision of Financial Market Infrastructures

The Bank of England (Bank) co-operates with the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) (‘The Authorities’), to supervise financial market infrastructure (FMI).

A memorandum of understanding (MoU)footnote [1] facilitates effective supervision and policy making by the authorities. The MoU allows for the exchange of information between the authorities and promotes efficiency by minimising duplication of regulatory activities regarding FMIs. The MoU must be reviewed annuallyfootnote [2] to ensure it is proving effective. This involves requesting feedback from supervised FMIs on whether the proposed co-operation is working effectively.

The Bank and FCA held a consultation with FMIs: Central Counterparties (CCPs), Recognised Investment Exchanges (RIEs) and Recognised Central Securities Depositories (RCSDs) based on these firms’ interaction in 2023.

Respondents agreed that the arrangements of the MoU are proving to be effective and emphasised the importance of close and effective coordination between the authorities. They acknowledged the efforts made on coordination and agree that the Bank and FCA remain committed to effective co-operation. One noted feedback submitted last year had been acted upon. Respondents also highlighted increased communication and coordination between the respective supervisory teams relating to topics such as operational resilience.

The Bank and FCA agree that the arrangements of the MoU regarding co-operation continue to be effective with appropriate coordination and no material duplication between them. The Bank and FCA will seek to address any specific areas identified by firms, including the need for collaboration in relation to new rulemaking powers.

The MoU will be updated in 2024 to reflect changes related to the Financial Services Markets Act (2023), as well as new areas requiring coordination, including regulatory sandboxes, in which innovations can be safely tested, and policy initiatives.

The Bank and FCA are also agreeing a separate MoU setting out how they intend to co-operate with each other in relation to the operation and supervision of the Digital Securities Sandbox (DSS). This DSS MoU will be published before supervision in the DSS commences.

#

Source link

Earn $5,000 A MONTH From Home! Click Here



Resolvability assessment of major UK banks: 2024

News release

Today the Bank of England has published its second assessment for each of the eight major UK banks under the Resolvability Assessment Framework (RAF). This is our approach to assessing whether these firms are prepared for resolution. Our assessment gives further reassurance that if a major UK bank were to fail today it could enter resolution safely: remaining open and continuing to provide vital banking services, with shareholders and investors – not public funds – first in line to bear the costs of failure.

The assessment finds major UK banks have continued to make progress in improving their preparations for resolution, including embedding resolution preparations into their everyday business, and in addressing issues outstanding from the first assessment in 2022.

The Bank used the second RAF assessment to assess major UK banks’ progress against issues outstanding from the first assessment, and for the first time to test how their preparations for resolution work in practice. The assessment focussed on one of the three outcomes major UK banks need to achieve to be considered resolvable: having Adequate Financial Resources in the context of resolution.

As a natural consequence of the more detailed assessment conducted by the Bank, and the work done by firms themselves to test their capabilities, this second RAF assessment has identified new issues, but none of these issues are likely to impede the Bank’s ability to execute a resolution. Further improvements in the areas identified in this assessment will help smooth the execution of a resolution.

Banks are expected, as a priority, to address the feedback from this and the previous RAF assessment, and continuously maintain and improve their resolvability capabilities.

We will use future RAF assessments to undertake further detailed analysis of the major UK banks. The next RAF assessment will focus on the Continuity and Restructuring outcome, including an assessment of the readiness of the major UK banks to quickly plan for and execute restructuring options to address the causes of failure and restore viability.

In light of the progress made to date on resolvability and to give the Bank and major UK banks time to further enhance and progress testing of their resolution capabilities ahead of the next assessment, the PRA will consult on the necessary rule changes to postpone the third RAF assessment by one year to 2026-27 rather than 2025-26. The Bank will engage with the major UK banks over the coming months on their workplans and anticipated areas of focus during this period, so that progress on resolvability continues to be maintained.

Dave Ramsden, Deputy Governor for Markets, Banking, Payments and Resolution, said:

“We welcome the progress made by the major UK banks. Maintaining a credible and effective resolution regime is a continuous process, and authorities and firms need to respond as the financial system and regulatory landscape evolves. Resolvability will never be ‘done’ and there will always be lessons to learn from putting the regime into practice.”

Notes to editors

  1. The eight major UK banks in scope of RAF reporting, whose disclosures should be read alongside the Bank’s assessment, are: Barclays, HSBC, Lloyds Banking Group, Nationwide, NatWest Group, Santander UK, Standard Chartered and Virgin Money UK. Please see the firms’ own websites for their disclosures.
  2. We are not assessing firms because we think they are likely to experience problems, but so that we and the banks can prepare for the worst and act if needed.
  3. The Bank is the UK’s resolution authority. We work with firms to ensure that they are prepared to enter resolution if needed. If firms fail, we make sure that happens in an orderly way to minimise disruption to any of its vital services. This process is called resolution. See The Bank of England’s Approach to Assessing Resolvability and The Bank of England’s approach to resolution for more information.
  4. We assess firms’ preparations for resolution based on whether they can achieve the three resolvability outcomes:
    • having adequate financial resources in the context of resolution;
    • being able to continue to do business through resolution and restructuring; and
    • co-ordinating and communicating effectively internally and with the authorities and markets.
  5. The three outcomes are underpinned by policies published by the Bank and PRA to remove barriers to resolution. Firms need to meet the objectives of these policies at a minimum to achieve the resolvability outcomes.
  6. For the findings from the first RAF assessment, see Resolvability assessment of major UK banks: 2022. For today’s findings, see Resolvability assessment of major UK banks: 2024.

#

Source link

Earn $5,000 A MONTH From Home! Click Here



Minutes of the CBDC Technology Forum – July 2024

Minutes

Date of meeting: 16 July 2024

Item 1: Welcome

Tom Mutton (Chair) welcomed Members to the thirteenth meeting of the CBDC Technology Forum

The Chair stated that the Technology Forum was important to the Bank, and they were grateful for Members’ hard work in the subgroups which had been established on a time limited basis to help explore technology considerations relevant to the digital pound architecture.

The Chair noted the agenda for the meeting would comprise a presentation from the Bank on recommendations made by the subgroups. The Chair noted that this meeting was an opportunity to bring together work from the subgroups.

Item 2: Recap of subgroup discissions

The Bank stated that they would play back their understanding of the recommendations made by each subgroup.

The Bank recalled recommendations from each subgroup, starting with Subgroup 1 which explored technology options to ensure privacy in a digital pound and design of the alias service. The Bank highlighted the different roles of potential actors in a digital pound ecosystem, including payer, payee, Payer PIP and Payee PIP. The Bank also noted the separation of the role of a core ledger operator and an alias operator, as described by Subgroup 1, although there were no assumptions about who the operators would be.

The Bank played back other considerations from Subgroup 1, such as adopting techniques from other solutions including using multiple accounts or addresses to create noise.

In their hypothetical privacy model, Subgroup 1 had considered that the alias service would provide a mapping from aliases to identifiers, preventing the ledger from seeing personal data. The Bank asked Members to consider whether aliases could be mapped to the wallet provider rather than identifiers, to support greater levels of privacy. One Member stated that it would be possible to map to wallet providers instead of identifiers, but putting discoverability at the PIP level has both advantages and disadvantages.

The Bank then played back discussions from Subgroup 2, which focused on models of interaction between PIPs. The Bank recalled the three models of interaction proposed by Subgroup 2. The Bank highlighted other recommendations from Subgroup 2, including the need for standards to enable communication and support interoperability; and enabling payer and payee signature checking without revealing identity. The Bank stated that Subgroup 1 and 2’s work seemed to suggest that the communication model that allowed direct interaction between PIPs might be the most privacy preserving.

The Bank then played back work from Subgroups 3, which focused on core ledger technology, and Subgroup 4, which focused on requirements for providing a platform for innovation. Both Subgroups had discussed experiments for the Bank to consider.

The Bank stated that there were questions in Subgroup 3’s work about comparing decentralised ledger technologies and centralised ledger technologies in the areas of scalability, finality, availability and resilience and security.

The Bank stated that Subgroup 4 had suggestions for experimenting with a smart contact platform. The Bank acknowledged the potential need to experiment with an application programming interface (API) platform and a smart contract platform to the compare capabilities of both.

The Bank then played back possible options for integration between the API platform and smart contract system to examine subgroup 4’s suggestion. The first model exposed locks, such as HTLC locks, on the ledger and allowed firms to access it via APIs. The second model created a native implementation of the token CBDC, and the third smart contract logic hosted at the PIP layer and executed via the standard ledger interaction APIs.

The Bank recalled the list of experiment proposals from the subgroups, including decentralised finance style use cases, private amount and balances, interoperability, and tap and go. The Bank stated that these proposals might result in an architecture that supports capabilities such as locks/escrow and smart contracts. The Bank stated that they were minded to do such an experiment

Item 3: Next steps for the Technology Forum

The Bank asked Members to share their experience working in their subgroups.

One Member stated that there were strong leaders across groups and deadlines set by the Bank helped to push delivery. A few Members stated that they would have liked more support from the Bank in terms of administration and tooling.

The Bank thanked Members for their feedback and noted that the Bank would reach out soon with further information.

Item 4: Closing remarks

The Chair closed the meeting and thanked Members for contributions.

Attendees

Bank of England

Tom Mutton (Chair)

Danny Russell

Will Lovell

Members

Adrian Field, OneID

Alain Martin, Thales

Ashley Lannquist, IMF

Bejoy Das Gupta, eCurrency

David MacKeith

Dominic Black, Ledgerz

Edwin Aoki, Paypal

Gary King, Lloyds

Geoff Goodell, UCL

Georgios Samakovitis, University of Greenwich

Inga Mullins, Fluency

Joshua Jeeson Daniel, JP Morgan

Julia Demidova, FIS

Keith Bear, Cambridge Centre for Alternative Finance

Kene Ezeji-Okoye, Millicent Labs

Lars Hupel, Giesecke+Devrient

Lauren Del Giudice, Idemia

Lee Braine, Barclays

Michael Adams, Quali-Sign

Paul Lucas, IBM

Richard Brown, R3

Sarah Meiklejohn, IC3

Vikram Kimyani, Oracle

Will Drewry, Google

Apologies

Alan Ainsworth, Open Banking

Andrew Flatt, Archax

James Whittle, Pay.UK

Paul Carey, Stripe

Mark Shaw, Spotify

Simon Brayshaw, Motorway

Tom Beresford, Starling

Tim Moncrieff, Visa

#

Source link

Earn $5,000 A MONTH From Home! Click Here