The Bank of England launches consultation on Fundamental Rules for Financial Market Infrastructures and publishes its approach to FMI supervision

News release

The Bank of England (the Bank) is today consulting on proposals to introduce a set of Fundamental Rules for UK Financial Market Infrastructures (FMIs), which are essential to the smooth and safe operation of the UK financial system and broader economy. It has also published an updated approach document to set out how it supervises these critical firms.

The overarching aim of these publications is to increase transparency by clearly setting out the Bank’s expectations of FMIs and how it will act as FMI supervisor. FMIs the Bank supervises are central counterparties (CCPs), central securities depositories (CSDs), recognised payment systems operators (RPSOs) and specified service providers (SSPs). Both documents highlight the evolution of the Bank’s regulatory and supervisory regime across all FMI types. The Fundamental Rules will increase the effectiveness of the Bank’s supervision of these critical parts of the financial system, supporting UK financial stability and the UK economy more broadly.

Sarah Breeden, Deputy Governor for Financial Stability, said:

“The Fundamental Rules are the first use of the Bank’s new rulemaking powers for CCPs and CSDs. Building on the strong foundations we already have, we’re using this opportunity to be clear on what we expect from the firms we supervise. Together with our updated approach to supervision, it marks the next stage of the Bank designing a nimble, effective and forward-looking regulatory regime, with more to come in the near future.” 

Fundamental Rules consultation

The Bank’s consultation on Fundamental Rules is the first use of the Bank’s new power to make legally binding rules for UK CCPs and CSDs. They will also apply to Bank-regulated UK payments systems and specified service providers.

The rules will provide greater clarity on the Bank’s desired outcomes across areas such as governance, financial and operational resilience, and consideration of FMIs’ impacts on the broader financial system. The rules will also reinforce the Bank’s commitment to international standards of FMI regulation.

By setting out the high-level outcomes the Bank is seeking, these proposals support the Bank’s new secondary objective to facilitate innovation in FMI services. They have also been subject to a cost benefit analysis that has been scrutinised by the independent cost benefit analysis panel that provides advice to the Bank and the PRA.

Approach to Supervision

The supervisory approach document sets out how the Bank will supervise FMIs. This additional clarity will help effective supervision by ensuring FMIs have a clear understanding of what the Bank seeks to achieve. The supervisory approach will continue to evolve and the Bank will periodically update its approach to reflect its priorities and any new developments.

Next steps

The Bank’s consultation on Fundamental Rules is open until 19 February 2025, and the Bank intends to engage with stakeholders during this period to gather a range of views on the proposals. The Bank will also engage with stakeholders in respect of the supervisory approach document in Q1 2025.

#

Source link

Earn $5,000 A MONTH From Home! Click Here



Remit for the Monetary Policy Committee – November 2024

We use necessary cookies to make our site work (for example, to manage your session). We’d also like to use some non-essential cookies (including third-party cookies) to help us improve the site. By clicking ‘Accept recommended settings’ on this banner, you accept our use of optional cookies.





Necessary cookies

Necessary cookies enable core functionality on our website such as security, network management, and accessibility. You may disable these by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Analytics cookies

We use analytics cookies so we can keep track of the number of visitors to various parts of the site and understand how our website is used. For more information on how these cookies work please see our Cookie policy.

#

Source link

Earn $5,000 A MONTH From Home! Click Here



Remit and recommendations for the Financial Policy Committee – November 2024

We use necessary cookies to make our site work (for example, to manage your session). We’d also like to use some non-essential cookies (including third-party cookies) to help us improve the site. By clicking ‘Accept recommended settings’ on this banner, you accept our use of optional cookies.





Necessary cookies

Necessary cookies enable core functionality on our website such as security, network management, and accessibility. You may disable these by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Analytics cookies

We use analytics cookies so we can keep track of the number of visitors to various parts of the site and understand how our website is used. For more information on how these cookies work please see our Cookie policy.

#

Source link

Earn $5,000 A MONTH From Home! Click Here



The PRA consults on reforms to the UK Insurance Special Purpose Vehicle regulatory framework

News release

Today, the Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA) published consultation paper (CP) 15/24 proposing reforms to the UK Insurance Special Purpose Vehicle (UK ISPV) regulatory framework, through a combination of changes to the finalised PRA rules and policy materials also published today in policy statement (PS) 15/24 that will replace Solvency II assimilated law.

The proposed reforms are intended to enhance the safety and soundness of the insurance sector by making more diversified reinsurance capital available to cedants while also furthering the PRA’s secondary competitiveness and growth objective by making authorisation of UK ISPVs faster and easier. 

The proposals introduce a new accelerated pathway for certain UK ISPV applications (e.g. some types of catastrophe bonds) which meet the criteria set out in the PRA’s proposed new statement of policy – Approach to authorising and supervising UK insurance special purpose vehicles. Under the accelerated pathway, in collaboration with the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), the PRA proposes to consider applications and, where satisfied, issue approvals within 10 working days (rather than the current 4–6-week process) of an application being submitted to the PRA and deemed complete.  In addition, the proposed reforms will make it easier for a wider range of current market practices to be undertaken in the UK, while also streamlining and speeding up the standard application and approval processes. The reforms will also clarify the PRA’s expectations of UK insurers who cede risks to Special Purpose Vehicles, wherever they are established.

Sam Woods the Deputy Governor for prudential regulation said:

‘These reforms will deliver a much faster turn-around time for approval of new Insurance Special Purpose Vehicles in the UK, supporting growth and competitiveness while maintaining safety and soundness.’

To help inform these proposals the PRA convened a number of discussions with industry, including a subject expert group, to gather a broad range of information and explore options for proposed reforms.  

Next steps

The PRA invites feedback on the proposals set out in this consultation and welcomes further discussion from stakeholders to help inform its final policy decisions. The consultation period closes on 14 February 2025. Please address any comments or enquiries to CP15_24@bankofengland.co.uk. The PRA proposes to publish final policy for firms in mid-2025.

The current requirements on UK ISPVs derive from a combination of the PRA’s final policy outlined in PS15/24 and UK legislation. The PRA is working actively with stakeholders to agree the most effective approach to introducing further reforms to the UK ISPV framework. 
The PRA is grateful for the input received to date and looks forward to further constructive engagement and feedback during the consultation period.

#

Source link

Earn $5,000 A MONTH From Home! Click Here



Bank of England to hear the views of local people in Birmingham about the cost of living

News release

The Bank of England is to hear from local people in Birmingham about the impact of the cost of living on their finances, as part of our Citizens’ Forum Programme which has been running across the UK since 2018.

The event is designed to gather information from local people, which will complement existing data and analysis, and help inform the Bank’s policy decisions.

Over recent years, the Bank has raised interest rates to slow down price rises, and inflation has now fallen to currently stand at 1.7% (as at November 2024) but is expected to increase to around 2½% by the end of this year. At the meeting of 7 November, the Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) felt it was appropriate to reduce Bank Rate to 4.75%).

Inflation is now just below the 2% target, and the MPC needs to make sure it stays close to that target sustainably, (by ensuring it doesn’t cut interest rates too quickly or by too much). But if the economy evolves as expected, it’s likely that interest rates will continue to fall gradually from here.

The event in Birmingham on Tuesday 10 December (5.30pm-8.00pm) will give attendees the opportunity to share their views with Bank officials, including Nathanaël (Nat) Benjamin, Executive Director for Financial Stability Strategy and Risk and a member of the Bank’s Financial Policy Committee (FPC). The FPC identifies and monitors risks that threaten the resilience of the UK financial system. He will be joined by staff from the Bank’s Agency for the West Midlands.  

Graeme Chaplin, the Bank’s Agent for the West Midlands said: “As the Governor has previously highlighted, there is great value for the Bank of England in hearing from local communities. It helps us understand the impact interest rates are having on people’s lives and what inflationary pressures we need to guard against.

We welcome views and questions from people in Birmingham about the cost of living or the actions the Bank is taking to keep inflation low and stable.”

The event will be chaired by Bridget Blow, non-executive director of English Netball and former Deputy Chair of Coventry Building Society.

Anyone aged over 18 is eligible to apply to attend which you can do via the Bank’s website before Wednesday 27 November when registration closes.

Refreshments will be provided and the Bank will make a payment of £25 to all attendees to cover expenses.

#

Source link

Earn $5,000 A MONTH From Home! Click Here



Bank Rate reduced to 4.75% – November 2024

Monetary Policy Summary, November 2024

The Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) sets monetary policy to meet the 2% inflation target, and in a way that helps to sustain growth and employment. The MPC adopts a medium-term and forward-looking approach to determine the monetary stance required to achieve the inflation target sustainably.

At its meeting ending on 6 November 2024, the MPC voted by a majority of 8–1 to reduce Bank Rate by 0.25 percentage points, to 4.75%. One member preferred to maintain Bank Rate at 5%.

There has been continued progress in disinflation, particularly as previous external shocks have abated, although remaining domestic inflationary pressures are resolving more slowly.

CPI inflation fell to 1.7% in September but is expected to increase to around 2½% by the end of the year as weakness in energy prices falls out of the annual comparison. Services consumer price inflation has declined to 4.9%. Annual private sector regular average weekly earnings growth has continued to fall but remained elevated at 4.8% in the three months to August. Headline GDP growth is expected to fall back to its recent underlying pace of around ¼% per quarter over the second half of this year. The MPC judges that the labour market continues to loosen, although it appears relatively tight by historical standards.

Monetary policy has been guided by the need to squeeze remaining inflationary pressures out of the economy to achieve the 2% target both in a timely manner and on a lasting basis. The Committee’s deliberations have been supported by the consideration of a range of cases that could impact the evolution of inflation persistence. These three cases are set out further in the accompanying November Monetary Policy Report.

In the first case, most of the remaining persistence in inflation may dissipate quickly as pay and price-setting dynamics continue to normalise following the unwinding of the global shocks that drove up inflation. In the second case, a period of economic slack may be required to normalise these dynamics fully. In the third case, some inflationary persistence may also reflect structural shifts in wage and price-setting behaviour. Each case would have different implications for how quickly the restrictiveness of monetary policy could be withdrawn.

The MPC’s latest projections for activity and inflation are also set out in the accompanying November Report. This forecast is based on the second case. CPI inflation is projected to fall back to around the 2% target in the medium term, conditioned on the usual 15 day average of forward interest rates, as a margin of slack emerges later in the forecast period that acts against second-round effects in domestic prices and wages.

The combined effects of the measures announced in Autumn Budget 2024 are provisionally expected to boost the level of GDP by around ¾% at their peak in a year’s time, relative to the August projections. The Budget is provisionally expected to boost CPI inflation by just under ½ of a percentage point at the peak, reflecting both the indirect effects of the smaller margin of excess supply and direct impacts from the Budget measures.

There remains significant uncertainty around the outlook for the labour market. Data are difficult to interpret and wage growth has been more elevated than usual relationships would predict. The impact of the Budget announcements on inflation will depend on the degree to and speed with which these higher costs pass through into prices, profit margins, wages and employment.

At this meeting, the Committee voted to reduce Bank Rate to 4.75%, reflecting the continued progress in disinflation.

Based on the evolving evidence, a gradual approach to removing policy restraint remains appropriate. Monetary policy will need to continue to remain restrictive for sufficiently long until the risks to inflation returning sustainably to the 2% target in the medium term have dissipated further. The Committee continues to monitor closely the risks of inflation persistence and will decide the appropriate degree of monetary policy restrictiveness at each meeting.

Minutes of the Monetary Policy Committee meeting ending on 6 November 2024

1: Before turning to its immediate policy decision, the Committee discussed: the international economy; monetary and financial conditions; demand and output; and supply, costs and prices. The latest data on these topics were set out in the accompanying November 2024 Monetary Policy Report.

2: The Committee discussed the near-term global risks and their potential impact on the inflation outlook in the United Kingdom. The balance of risks to global activity, particularly stemming from China and Germany, remained to the downside in the near term. Alongside that, there were upside risks to goods and commodity prices from greater trade fragmentation and adverse geopolitical developments, including from events in the Middle East.

3: Since the MPC’s previous meeting, the market-implied path for Bank Rate in the United Kingdom had shifted up materially. For the period prior to Autumn Budget 2024, market intelligence had attributed the modest upward moves in the market-implied path largely to international factors such as stronger-than-expected economic data in the United States. For the period around the time of the Budget, the upward shift had been more material. However, market pricing had continued to remain consistent with a 25 basis point reduction in Bank Rate at this MPC meeting.

4: Bank staff continued to judge that the economy was growing at around ¼% per quarter on an underlying basis. According to the official data, GDP had grown by 0.5% in 2024 Q2, 0.2 percentage points weaker than had been expected in the August Report, and 0.1 percentage points weaker than the earlier outturn had indicated at the time of the MPC’s previous meeting. Through the second half of 2024, GDP was projected to grow at a somewhat slower rate than in Q2.

5: The Committee discussed the implications of the latest activity data for the evolution of slack in the economy. There was limited evidence that aggregate demand was falling short of aggregate supply. Surveys of capacity utilisation had remained close to their historical averages, and indicators of labour market tightness, while easing of late, continued to appear relatively tight by historical standards. These developments reinforced the view that the drag on activity from the lagged transmission of past monetary tightening was unlikely to intensify over the coming year.

6: There had been material news to the economic outlook in Autumn Budget 2024. Taken together, the fiscal policy announcements were provisionally expected to boost the level of GDP by around ¾% at their peak in a year’s time, relative to the August projections. The Committee also discussed the increase in the overall cost of employment that was likely to follow from the changes to employers’ National Insurance contributions (NICs) and the increase in the National Living Wage (NLW), and the degree to and speed with which that increase might be transmitted into prices, profit margins, wages and employment.

7: Twelve-month CPI inflation had fallen to 1.7% in September. The decline in CPI inflation since the start of this year had primarily reflected lower goods price inflation, with disinflation in underlying services prices having been less pronounced. Services price inflation had, however, decreased quite sharply to 4.9% in September. Most of this downside news had been concentrated in more volatile categories, and some of this was expected to unwind. Services price inflation was expected to remain broadly unchanged over the next six months. Annual growth in private-sector regular average weekly earnings had fallen back significantly since mid-2023, but it had remained relatively strong at 4.8% in the three months to August.

The immediate policy decision

8: The Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) sets monetary policy to meet the 2% inflation target, and in a way that helps to sustain growth and employment. The MPC adopts a medium-term and forward-looking approach to determine the monetary stance required to achieve the inflation target sustainably.

9: Since the MPC’s previous meeting, there had been continued disinflation. Twelve-month CPI inflation had fallen to 1.7% in September. The decline in CPI inflation since the start of the year had primarily reflected lower goods price inflation, with disinflation in underlying services prices less pronounced.

10: Annual growth in private sector regular average weekly earnings had fallen back significantly since mid-2023 but had remained relatively strong at 4.8% in the three months to August. Year-ahead expectations for wage growth in the DMP Survey had been flat at around 4% since May, while initial Agents’ intelligence had reported an expected range of pay awards between 2% and 4% next year.

11: GDP had grown by 0.5% in 2024 Q2, slightly weaker than had been expected in the August Report. GDP growth was expected to fall back to its recent underlying pace of around ¼% per quarter over the second half of the year.

12: The combined effects of the measures announced in Autumn Budget 2024 were provisionally expected to boost the level of GDP by around ¾% at their peak in a year’s time, relative to the August projections. The Budget was provisionally expected to boost CPI inflation by just under ½ of a percentage point at its peak, reflecting both the indirect effects of the smaller margin of excess supply and direct impacts from the Budget measures.

13: Based on the collective steer from a wide range of indicators, the MPC judged that the labour market continued to ease but that it appeared relatively tight by historical standards. However, there was significant uncertainty around the labour market outlook and its impact on inflationary persistence. The combined effect of some policies announced in the Budget, particularly the increase in employer NICs and the NLW, was likely to increase the overall costs of employment. The net effect of this news on aggregate inflation would depend on the degree to and speed with which those costs would be transmitted into prices, wages, employment, or otherwise absorbed in profit margins or productivity growth. On the one hand, higher labour costs could constrain firms’ cash-flows if there was limited pass-through to pricing. This in turn could moderate wage growth and further loosen the labour market through reduced labour demand. On the other hand, the increase in labour costs could prove more inflationary if upward pressure on prices were passed on to consumers.

14: The Committee continued to monitor the accumulation of evidence from a broad range of indicators of inflation persistence, including evidence that could point to the three cases set out in the November Monetary Policy Report having begun to materialise. In the first case, most of the remaining persistence in inflation might dissipate quickly as pay and price-setting dynamics continued to normalise following the unwinding of the global shocks that drove up inflation. In the second case, a period of economic slack might be required to normalise these dynamics fully. In the third case, some inflationary persistence might reflect structural shifts in wage and price-setting behaviour.

15: In the November forecast, which was based on the second case, second-round effects in domestic prices and wages were expected to take somewhat longer to unwind than they did to emerge. The margin of slack that emerged later in the forecast period would act against those second-round effects, leading CPI inflation to fall back to around the 2% target in the medium term.

16: If, for example, the economy were to grow broadly as expected, but material downside news to wages and services inflation were nonetheless to emerge, this could increase the weight that the MPC would place on the first case materialising. Signs of a slowing in the disinflation process, particularly in the absence of a pickup in activity growth, could instead increase the likelihood that the MPC would place on the third case materialising.

17: At this meeting, eight members preferred to reduce Bank Rate to 4.75%. There had been continued progress in disinflation, particularly as previous external shocks had abated, although remaining domestic inflationary pressures were resolving more slowly. These members put different probabilities on and risks around the three cases, but they believed that a cut in Bank Rate was appropriate at this meeting. They would continue to assess the range of evidence over time.

18: One member preferred to maintain Bank Rate at 5%. For this member, structural factors in wage and price-setting dynamics continued to draw out the underlying disinflation process, and CPI inflation was projected to remain above the 2% target until the end of the forecast period. Wage developments might continue to be more robust than projected as firms and workers incorporated past and upcoming adjustments in the National Living Wage and National Insurance contributions. This, along with prospects for more robust demand associated with the Budget, was likely to support pricing opportunities for firms. In the face of these uncertainties, maintaining the current level of Bank Rate would allow time to evaluate whether these upside pressures would materialise.

19: Based on the evolving evidence, a gradual approach to removing policy restraint remained appropriate. Monetary policy would need to continue to remain restrictive for sufficiently long until the risks to inflation returning sustainably to the 2% target in the medium term had dissipated further. The Committee would continue to monitor closely the risks of inflation persistence and would decide the appropriate degree of monetary policy restrictiveness at each meeting.

20: The Chair invited the Committee to vote on the proposition that:

  • Bank Rate should be reduced by 0.25 percentage points, to 4.75%.

21: Eight members (Andrew Bailey, Sarah Breeden, Swati Dhingra, Megan Greene, Clare Lombardelli, Huw Pill, Dave Ramsden and Alan Taylor) voted in favour of the proposition. Catherine L Mann voted against the proposition, preferring to maintain Bank Rate at 5%.

Operational considerations

22: On 6 November 2024, the stock of UK government bonds held for monetary policy purposes was £655 billion.

23: The following members of the Committee were present:

  • Andrew Bailey, Chair
  • Sarah Breeden
  • Swati Dhingra
  • Megan Greene
  • Clare Lombardelli
  • Catherine L Mann
  • Huw Pill
  • Dave Ramsden
  • Alan Taylor

Sam Beckett was present as the Treasury representative.

David Roberts was also present on 28 October, as an observer for the purpose of exercising oversight functions in his role as a member of the Bank’s Court of Directors.

#

Source link

Earn $5,000 A MONTH From Home! Click Here



Minutes of the Meeting of the Court of Directors held on 19 September 2024

Minutes of the Meeting of the Court of Directors held on 19 September 2024

Present:

David Roberts, Chair

Andrew Bailey, Governor

Sarah Breeden, Deputy Governor – Financial Stability

Clare Lombardelli, Deputy Governor – Monetary Policy

Sir Dave Ramsden, Deputy Governor – Markets & Banking

Sam Woods, Deputy Governor – Prudential Regulation

Jonathan Bewes

Sabine Chalmers

Lord Jitesh Gadhia

Anne Glover

Sir Ron Kalifa

Diana Noble

Frances O’Grady

In attendance:

Ben Stimson, Chief Operating Officer

Apologies:

Tom Shropshire

Secretary:

Sebastian Walsh

1. Conflicts, Minutes and Matters Arising

There were no conflicts declared in relation to the present agenda.

The minutes of the meeting held on 5 July 2024 were approved.

The Chair informed Court that the Bank’s Cyber Security team would hold a session for Court at its next meeting in October. He added that the Bank’s review of its strategic priorities would also come to the next meeting of Court.

The Chair also welcomed the appointment of Sebastian Walsh who had been appointed as Executive Director, Head of Leeds and Secretary to the Bank.

Under Matters Arising, the Secretary noted that progress against the Bank’s 2023 Viewpoint commitments would be addressed as part of the COO update. He also updated Court on the secretariat’s planning for a future meeting of Court at the Bank’s Leeds office.

2. RemCo Update

Diana Noble updated Court on recent meetings of RemCo, including the Pensions Review and the Annual Salary Review.

3. Governor’s Update

The Governor updated Court on developments since its last meeting.

The Governor noted the launch of the formal consultation with staff on the pensions review.

The Governor also updated Court on early engagement between the Bank and the new Government areas. Court members noted the progress on Basel 3.1, and that industry reaction had been largely positive.

4. COO Update

(Ben Stimson, Natasha Oakley, Mark Menary and Natasha Wilson)

Ben Stimson informed Court that good momentum had been maintained across a number of change initiatives. These included the Bank’s progress towards using Cloud services for its technology systems and recruitment of critical roles. He added the Bank was also on track to deliver its strategy for expanding its office in Leeds.

Court reflected on staff sentiment as measured in the recent Viewpoint survey.

Non-executive members of Court noted the experience of other industries at present and how to balance the positive benefits of flexibility for staff morale with the risks of detachment. Frances O’Grady noted that the development of the Leeds office gave the opportunity to test different approaches to culture building.

Jonathan Bewes informed Court that ARCo wished to assess how the Bank’s portfolio of investment projects was being managed and how decisions might be best sequenced.

  1. Colleague Insight Survey Results, Summer 2024

Mark Menary advised Court on the results of the latest Viewpoint survey.

Court members discussed the results.

Court members noted the challenges posed to career progression by the current low level of attrition.

Court members also reflected on the findings around equal opportunity.

The Governor said the Bank’s response would focus on a few key issues, and that it would be open with staff on this. The Chair said that any response should be rooted in the Bank’s strategy development, which was currently ongoing.

  1. Pensions Review

Natasha Wilson introduced the item, noting that engagement with the Union had been intensive, including around communication planning.

Natasha Wilson noted feedback had focussed on the personal financial impact of proposals – both the scale and timing – and particularly the transition arrangements. The Bank had considered this feedback in the renewed proposals.

The Bank was now in formal consultation with staff.

The Chair concluded the item by observing the importance of improving understanding of pensions, both among Bank staff and more broadly, noting it was a complex subject. He added that the Bank was part way through a major change agenda and was clearly working hard in learning how to execute this at pace and with intensity.

5. RTGS Renewal Update

(Victoria Cleland, Nathan Monk and John Stocker)

Victoria Cleland updated Court on the RTGS Renewal Programme. Victoria Cleland noted that testing had progressed well. However, the Bank’s partners had identified a number of issues that meant that the TS3 go live would need to be delayed to ensure the Bank had sufficient confidence in its stability before launch.

Court noted their support of delaying launch.

Members of Court reflected that the stability of the system should be the key determinant and driver in choosing a new date for launch.

Court registered its thanks to staff working on RTGS Renewal Programme.

6. Location Strategy Project Update

(Vivienne Grafton and Ivar van Hasselt)

Vivienne Grafton updated Court on progress made with regards to the Bank’s Location Strategy, since it was discussed at its May meeting.

The Bank’s expansion in Leeds was noted, and is to be achieved through relocations from London and new hires in the local area. There was broad enthusiasm for the expansion and a good level of interest had been registered in relocating by staff currently working from London.

Ivar van Hasselt set out that in time around 10% of each individual area overseen by a Deputy Governor – or the Governor – would be based in Leeds. Within that strategy, it was open to Executive Directors to decide whether to build centres of excellence in Leeds for particular functions or take a broader cross-section of roles. Not all roles would be equally suited to being done from Leeds.

Court observed the importance of collective leadership and Governors’ championing the operation in Leeds to ensure its success.

Turning to the Bank’s London locations, Vivienne Grafton set out that the focus was on modernising the Threadneedle Street premises in line with modern working practices while respecting the heritage of the building.

Court expressed its support for the Location Strategy and the expansion of the Leeds office.

7. Union Presentation

(Faisel Choudhry)

Faisel Choudhry was welcomed to the meeting.

Faisel Choudhry updated Court on the work of the Union and the views of its members, whose numbers had grown.

Court commended Faisel Choudhry for his advocacy for Bank staff and his constructive engagement with the Bank’s executive.

8. Gender Action Plan

(Nathanael Benjamin, Natasha Oakley, Lisa Leaman and Baljinder Virk)

Lisa Leaman set out the action plan.

Court members noted the importance of a careful review of the Bank’s gender targets at all levels, to ensure it developed and retained a strong pipeline of female talent.

Several members of Court noted a common theme with other aspects of diversity and inclusion, in that progress would depend on developing strong people managers who could execute policy effectively in this space.

The Chair thanked members of the Bank’s Women in the Bank Network and the Bank’s People Directorate for their work on the action plan.

9. Disability Programme Deep Dive Update 2024

(Victoria Cleland, Natasha Oakley, Frances Hill and Rohan Tambyraja)

The Chair welcomed the presenters to the meeting.

Rohan Tambyraja introduced the item. He emphasised the importance of improving transparency and committing to delivering best practice.

Victoria Cleland said there had been good progress in delivering workplace adjustments and noted the work of the People Directorate in this area.

Members of Court observed the need for strong line management support of colleagues with disabilities, the importance of champions and allies.

The Chair thanked the presenters and affirmed Court’s support for their ambitions in this area.

10. Annual update on the Resolution Directorate (RD) including the Financial Stability Banking Operations (FSBO) update on the Bank’s readiness to provide emergency liquidity support

(Ruth Smith and Andrew Hewitt)

Ruth Smith updated Court on the Resolution Directorate’s work over the past year. Dave Ramsden noted some organisational changes made to the Directorate, to enhance its resilience.

11. Our Code

(Sebastian Walsh, Michael Salib and Alison Kavanagh)

Sebastian Walsh introduced the item, noting changes made following Court members’ comments.

Court approved Our Code, subject to some final amendments to be approved by the Chair.

12. Committee Appointments and Conflicts Update

(Sebastian Walsh)

Court noted the paper.

13. Papers for Information

Court noted:

  • Monetary Policy Committee Report
  • Scottish & Northern Ireland Banknotes Annual Report 2024
  • Approved minutes from committee meetings since the last meeting of Court on 5 July 2024

The meeting of Court was closed.

#

Source link

Earn $5,000 A MONTH From Home! Click Here